VerifyingTrump's claims,one at a time.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Contemporaneous reporting from multiple reputable outlets describes a presidential directive and related administration orders for U.S. agencies to cease use of Anthropic’s technology, supporting the claim as stated; nuances about legal mechanism and implementation explain why effects may vary in practice.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Parts of the claim are supported by the supplied sources (wins in 2016 and 2020 and a higher 2020 raw vote total than 2016), but the 2024 win and the unqualified superlative about the highest vote total in Texas history are not verifiable from the provided sources, so the overall claim is MIXED.

Unverified

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Because the provided sources establish Miller's prominence and past endorsements generally but do not contain the specific quoted endorsement, the claim as stated cannot be verified from these sources and is rated UNVERIFIED.

Unverified

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The available Minnesota DHS and news sources document that autism services and the EIDBI benefit have been tracked and reviewed (including in 2024), but they do not provide or corroborate the specific dollar amounts or the 34,000% increase claimed, so the claim cannot be verified from the supplied sources.

False

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The available authoritative primary-result source (NYT) explicitly lists the SD 38 Republican contest as uncontested, so the claim of winning by 28 points is contradicted by the provided evidence.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim mixes fact and overstatement: it is true a judge refused to block construction and allowed work to proceed, but false/misleading to say the court “threw out and completely erased” the effort to stop the ballroom because the lawsuit and possible future relief remain active. The correct characterization is that the request for an immediate halt was denied, not that the legal challenge was entirely eliminated.

Unverified

6 supporting sources

Verdict: UNVERIFIED — the listed sources are the right kind to confirm the claim, but the provided excerpts do not contain the specific District 41 margin, so the claim cannot be confirmed or refuted from these sources alone.

Unverified

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Because none of the provided sources contain explicit, verifiable documentation that someone won Indiana State Senate District 39 by 55 points, the claim cannot be verified from the supplied material and is therefore rated UNVERIFIED.

Unverified

2 supporting sources

Verdict: Because the two provided sources do not contain any account of a Massachusetts Auditor detailing how SNAP and MassHealth schemes were carried out, the claim cannot be verified from the supplied evidence and is rated UNVERIFIED.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim is mixed because the president does have some statutory powers to impose tariffs without returning to Congress in specific, procedurally constrained cases, but courts have recently limited or questioned unilateral executive actions and indicated that explicit congressional authorization is required in other circumstances.

Unverified

1 supporting sources

Verdict: Because the only allowed source addresses Medicare Advantage audits and contains no information about the Massachusetts Auditor’s Office or a nearly $12 million fraud in SNAP, MassHealth, or other public-benefit programs, the claim cannot be verified from the provided material.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Key factual elements are supported (Operation Midnight Hammer occurred, B-2s were involved, and Gen. Dan Caine publicly briefed on it), but the stronger claims that the attack entirely destroyed Iran's nuclear development and that Gen. Caine was definitively "in charge" of execution are not confirmed by the cited sources, so the overall claim is MIXED.

False

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The available sources do not report a recent Newsom withdrawal from an active presidential campaign; they indicate he opted not to run in the earlier cycle and is being discussed as a possible future candidate, so the claim that he "just dropped out" is false.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Sources in the provided set explicitly record that the United States has the highest total number of Olympic gold medals in history, so the claim is TRUE when read as referring to the all‑time, cumulative Olympic gold‑medal count; the statement should be qualified if interpreted as applying to a specific Games or a single‑Games record.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim accurately reflects Trump’s public statement of intent and his wording that the increase would be “effective immediately,” but contemporaneous reporting also shows the administration still needed to determine and formally issue the new tariff actions, so the practical, immediate implementation is unclear — therefore the truth is mixed.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Available reporting shows a specific, limited action by Trump in East Palestine but does not document fulfillment of broader or long-term promises, so the claim is partially supported and therefore rated MIXED.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim is partly true that the CIA retracted intelligence reports, but the leap to a "historic" retraction that definitively "exposes political bias in Obama-Biden spy agencies" is not supported by the cited reporting; the retractions spanned multiple administrations and the sources do not establish the asserted systemic partisan exposure.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim is TRUE because the Roberts Court expressly held that IEEPA does not authorize tariffs (shutting that door) while limiting its decision to that statute and leaving other statutory authorities (e.g., Section 232 and other laws) unadjudicated, which preserves some legal avenues for the administration to pursue tariffs.

False

6 supporting sources

Verdict: None of the provided, reputable sources show a new FBI memo that confirms Biden personally ordered or was involved in the Mar-a-Lago search; fact-checking and news reports directly contradict or fail to substantiate that specific assertion, so the claim is false.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Contemporary reporting from multiple reputable outlets consistently documents substantial ecological degradation, air-quality and health risks, and rapid near-term decline of the Great Salt Lake, supporting the claim that it is an environmental hazard requiring prompt action; however, some uncertainties and stakeholder disputes exist about specific causes and solutions.

Unverified

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The sources clearly establish that Susan Rice serves on Netflix’s board, but they do not provide explicit evidence that she is being paid by Netflix, so the claim about payment is unverified based on the provided sources.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Multiple major outlets reporting on the CIA review say the agency withdrew about 19 (nearly 20) intelligence products after finding they did not meet analytic standards, citing political bias and tradecraft/analytic problems; because reporting shows nuance in specific causes and uses approximations, the concise claim is supported but with qualifications.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Available sources verify Dan Patrick chaired Trump's Texas campaign in 2016 and 2020 but contain no evidence that he was Texas chair for the 2024 campaign, so the overall claim is partially true and partially unverified.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The part of the claim saying the president announced intent and posted that statement is supported by contemporaneous news reports; the assertion that the hospital ship is actually "on the way" lacks independent verification in the available reporting, so the overall claim is mixed.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: AP reports that Trump rescinded his endorsement of Rep. Jeff Hurd and is endorsing Hope Scheppelman, and NPR provides contextual confirmation of the tariff dispute cited as the reason; because the claim is directly reported by AP and contextually supported by NPR, the claim is rated TRUE though corroboration among the other provided summaries is limited.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Contemporary, reputable election-result pages consistently show Trump won Texas in 2016, 2020 and 2024 and report his 2024 Texas vote total at roughly 6.4 million, described as the largest raw vote total in Texas history, so the claim is rated TRUE.

False

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim conflates distinct statistics (tariff revenue increases vs. trade deficit levels), misattributes who pays tariffs, and is contradicted by independent analysis and reporting showing the overall U.S. trade deficit was not cut by ~78% as a result of tariffs.

Mixed

6 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim mixes accurate facts (a long lease-back of the Diego Garcia base and transfer of sovereignty to Mauritius) with inaccurate or misleading elements (calling it a 100-year lease rather than the widely reported 99 years and implying the lease transfers control/rights to other "entities claiming title"). Therefore the statement is MIXED.

Unverified

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Because none of the provided sources mention Petr Macinka or the quoted praise/remark, the claim cannot be verified from the supplied material; therefore it is rated UNVERIFIED.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Contemporary news reports from Reuters and USA TODAY state that Anthony Powell was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, supporting the claim; the only cautions are the naming variant (“Tony” vs. “Anthony”) and that the reports describe a nomination rather than a completed confirmation.

True

5 supporting sources

Verdict: Reuters’ report that Trump nominated Justin D. Smith to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, together with the court filing showing a Justin D. Smith based in St. Louis who has represented Trump, directly supports the claim; limited corroboration in the remaining provided sources and a same-name ambiguity lower but do not overturn confidence.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Contemporary reports from Reuters and USA TODAY state that Tony Mattivi was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, and no provided source disputes that account, so the claim is rated TRUE.

True

6 supporting sources

Verdict: Major mainstream news outlets in the supplied sources (Reuters and USA TODAY) report that the president nominated Jeffrey Kuhlman to the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, so the claim is rated TRUE with high confidence based on those reports.

Mixed

5 supporting sources

Verdict: The statement combines accurate elements (the UK securing long-term use of Diego Garcia through a leaseback and involving a claimant) with factual errors and misleading framing: the leaseback term is reported as 99 years (not 100), and the counterparty is the state of Mauritius — not an anonymous or newly appearing 'entity.' Because of these mixed truths and mischaracterizations, the appropriate rating is MIXED.

Mixed

4 supporting sources

Verdict: The claim mixes true elements (a planned White House ballroom exists and private donors have been solicited and pledged funds) with unproven assertions (a complete, transparent accounting demonstrating it is fully paid by private donors and that it will cost taxpayers nothing). Major outlets and fact-checkers confirm donations and pledges but find gaps in public accounting and note that government-provided services (security, operations, maintenance, etc.) could still impose costs on taxpayers. Because the key funding breakdown and total taxpayer exposure have not been transparently documented, the claim as stated is misleading and best rated MIXED.

True

3 supporting sources

Verdict: Multiple reputable news organizations reported that President Trump announced the nomination of Tony (Anthony) Mattivi to be a judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. Those reports support the claim that he was nominated. However, nomination by the President is an initial step — confirmation by the U.S. Senate and issuance of a judicial commission are separate, subsequent steps. Given the contemporaneous news reporting and lack of evidence of Senate confirmation as of the announcement, the claim that he was nominated is TRUE, with the important contextual note that he is not yet a confirmed or commissioned federal judge.